In November 2016, we highlighted a patent troll case over Web autoplay technology. That same month, Netflix released its offline-download feature, which is now the subject of a patent infringement case. A known
[Read More]The future patent litigation landscape may be shaped by the Supreme Court’s future review and decisions on two notable patent cases: TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Brands Group LLC and Impression Products, Inc.
[Read More]Around the same time that Amazon was enjoying its “best ever” holiday season in 2016, it was reported that the global giant has plans to go sky-high — literally — with a patent
[Read More]It’s “fitting” that our first week of blogs in the new year, when exercise resolutions are fresh, includes an update on Fitbit and Jawbone’s legal laps. In 2015, we posted a blog about
[Read More]This year, we’ve blogged about patent wins against Apple over voice-system and ring-silencing technology. This month, we add a lawsuit over online payment technology to the files against Apple. According to The National
[Read More]This week, the Supreme Court began hearing oral arguments for Life Technologies v. Promega, in which the high court will determine whether a U.S. patent can still be infringed upon if a “substantial
[Read More]The U.S. Supreme Court will begin its day today by hearing opening arguments in the “century’s single most heated dispute over competing technology”: the long-running patent battle of Apple v. Samsung. Samsung is
[Read More]Last week, “patent trolls” notched another legal win against Apple in 2016. A Delaware federal jury ruled that the multinational technology company infringed on Mobile Media Ideas LLC’s mobile phone ring-silencing patent and
[Read More]Patent litigation has been exploding between technology giants, and nowhere is the trend more evident than among producers of mobile devices such as smart phones and tablets. You don’t have to look far
[Read More]We'll keep your email safe. No spam, we promise!
