The future patent litigation landscape may be shaped by the Supreme Court’s future review and decisions on two notable patent cases: TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Brands Group LLC and Impression Products, Inc.
[Read More]It’s “fitting” that our first week of blogs in the new year, when exercise resolutions are fresh, includes an update on Fitbit and Jawbone’s legal laps. In 2015, we posted a blog about
[Read More]This year, we’ve blogged about patent wins against Apple over voice-system and ring-silencing technology. This month, we add a lawsuit over online payment technology to the files against Apple. According to The National
[Read More]This week, the Supreme Court began hearing oral arguments for Life Technologies v. Promega, in which the high court will determine whether a U.S. patent can still be infringed upon if a “substantial
[Read More]Not long after one “patent troll” took a bite out of Apple in court in September, another filed suit against 14 media companies for allegedly infringing on its Web autoplay technology, even though
[Read More]The U.S. Supreme Court will begin its day today by hearing opening arguments in the “century’s single most heated dispute over competing technology”: the long-running patent battle of Apple v. Samsung. Samsung is
[Read More]Last week, “patent trolls” notched another legal win against Apple in 2016. A Delaware federal jury ruled that the multinational technology company infringed on Mobile Media Ideas LLC’s mobile phone ring-silencing patent and
[Read More]It seems obvious that patents were intended to be public. Ostensibly, patents reward innovation by allowing for a temporary legal monopoly, and legitimate patent-holders who are using patents to produce exclusive goods would
[Read More]Patent litigation has been exploding between technology giants, and nowhere is the trend more evident than among producers of mobile devices such as smart phones and tablets. You don’t have to look far
[Read More]The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has introduced its own model order regarding patent e-discovery. While based on the Model Order developed by U.S. Court of Appeals for the
[Read More]We'll keep your email safe. No spam, we promise!
